This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX-8350 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions. I thought I read somewhere that the FX-8xxx did well in floating point. The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD FX-8350 is just 17.1. It still holds just replace other software there instead of microsoft. There was a saying "what intel giveth microsoft taketh away". Linpack by Intel is an extremely stressful program that. 100 Frames per second or 150 FPS, who cares. Rate this 5 (Best) 4 3 2 1 (Worst) A program that simplifies the usage of Intel Linpack.
![intel burn test fx8350 intel burn test fx8350](https://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2012/11/amd-fx-8350-review/featured_single.jpg)
The ones for the FX-9xxx CPUs.īut probably the real problems are mostly in software. The fact Intel CPUs might be faster on benchmarks doesnt mean they are any faster in real world applications. My overall benchmark was 3387. Hello everyone My rig is an Asus M5A87 MOBO, a 750W PSU, AMD FX 8350, G-Skill Jigsaw RAM 8GB, two samsung EVO SSDs, and a brand new GTX 970.
#Intel burn test fx8350 pro#
The program comes in various flavours including versions optimised for the AMD K6, Intel Pentium, Pentium Pro family, BX, and MMX. New Benchmark - AMD FX 8350 08-06-2015, 06:38 AM. CPU Burn - P6 version by Robert Redelmeier (email protected) Maximum temperature achieved: 76C (peak) CPU Burn is a suite of highly optimised programs by Robert Redelmeier written in assembly language. There's a site (which I can't remember) that sells CPUs that they guarantee to OC well.Īs for MB, yeah the high-end Asus MBs probably needed. PC Test Kit Complete testing package Learn More Buy. Prime95 uses the floating point unit, (a disadvantage for the 8350 right there) that results in lots of stress and heat.
![intel burn test fx8350 intel burn test fx8350](http://programming.wmlcloud.com/image/042013/17/9113197.jpg)
#Intel burn test fx8350 upgrade#
The first motherboard would not pass stress testing at stock speeds.The higher end replacement would do only 4.3 game stable.A $200 dollar upgrade turned into a $450 dollar upgrade, almost a i5 2500k:madelf: I think the chip could do better IF you could supply enough amps, but I'm not willing to buy ANOTHER motherboard.Besides more speed would not have solved the low Skyrim preformance.(that took a 4690K) AMD Piledriver FX-8350 Review Power Consumption It's interesting to note the power consumption across all motherboards because energy results can fluctuate between manufacturers due to the features and specifications that are integrated. Originally posted by Ivan the SoSo:At 4.3 GHz you can game with it.(Skyrim, Bioshock, etc).But it will not pass stress testing (Intel burn test, Prime95,) unless you disabled a core from testing.(any core would do).When the computer would crash under testing it would "Black Screen", no errors or "Blue Screens".Much like it was unplugged while running.So it wasn't a what a hard core overclocker would call "stable".